(Bloomberg Opinion) -- The for-profit college industry is collapsing. The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that during the past five years, more than 1,200 college campuses have been closed — an average of about 20 every month. Of those that shut, 88 percent were for-profit, and their students amounted to 85 percent of those affected by the closures:
Enrollment at four-year for-profit colleges is in free fall, dropping 13.7 percent from fall 2014 to fall 2015, 14.5 percent the following year, and 7.1 percent the year after that.
Perhaps the only surprising thing was that it took this long. For-profit colleges have long been plagued by poor performance — a 2012 study by economists Kevin Lang and Russell Weinstein found no earnings premium from attending a for-profit university. Follow-up studies yielded similar results. But the price tag for these colleges was high, and students were encouraged to take out lots of loans to pay it. The inevitable result was a generation of for-profit college students with poor employment prospects and a mountain of debt. Meanwhile, a whiff of dubious marketing hung about the industry, with DeVry University being forced to pay a $100 million settlement for misleading prospective students about the economic benefits of attending.
The winnowing of the for-profit college industry shows that although it can take years for poor quality and high prices to reduce demand in the education sector, eventually it does happen. Fortunately, for-profits only account for a relatively small slice of undergraduate education — perhaps about a tenth. The more important question is whether the carnage among for-profits is a harbinger of similar declines for nonprofit and public colleges.
Enrollment at four-year public and nonprofit colleges has remained essentially unchanged during the past two years. And college enrollment rates overall — which includes the big decline in for-profits and a smaller decline in two-year public schools — are essentially constant since 2005. But this conceals some potentially important underlying trends. Hispanic enrollment rates are up since 2010, but white and black enrollment rates have dropped a bit:
Meanwhile, tuition may now be falling at four-year public and nonprofit universities — another potential sign of weakening demand:
If demand for college were weakening, this is probably how it would manifest itself. The number of spots at good schools is rationed by the application process — these schools limit their enrollment in order to maintain their prestige. So falling demand would reduce prices for these colleges, but not the number of people attending. Meanwhile, enrollment would fall at institutions that were less in demand, such as for-profits and two-year colleges.
Why might demand for college be weakening? One reason is that there are simply fewer young people in the country these days:
The reversal of Mexican immigration probably has something to do with that. Meanwhile, falling fertility rates will do even more to thin out the ranks of the young in the decades to come. U.S. universities could make up the difference by allowing in more international students, but President Donald Trump’s anti-immigration policies and attitudes have made that difficult; enrollment from overseas is now in decline.
The strengthening labor market might also be pulling a few young Americans away from college, though so far that trend seems to be very slight.
Another possible factor is that prospective college students may be learning to distinguish between the economic opportunities afforded by various college majors. Overall, the earnings premium for a bachelor’s degree has remained constant or continued to rise, depending on how it’s measured. But those overall numbers conceal large differences by field of study:
Unemployment rates also differ greatly between majors:
This may be why college students are avoiding humanities majors. But it could also mean that some prospective college students who don’t want to major in fields like science, technology, engineering, math, health or business might avoid college entirely, or be unwilling to attend more expensive schools.
Whatever the reason, if the decline in demand for college continues, it could be bad for many regions of the U.S. For more prestigious universities, falling undergraduate applications need not crush their plans for expansion. Most of the local economic benefit of a university comes from research, not from education. But a number of small towns owe their economic health to modest local colleges whose main activity is teaching; if these shrink or disappear due to falling college demand, the trend of local economic decline could accelerate.
Government programs to make college more affordable for lower-income Americans can help prop up enrollment in these vulnerable areas. But universities also need to help by cutting costs. Addressing administrative bloat and other sources of inefficiency will allow public and nonprofit colleges to make enrollment a more attractive proposition.
To contact the author of this story: Noah Smith at email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: James Greiff at firstname.lastname@example.org
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University, and he blogs at Noahpinion.
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion
©2019 Bloomberg L.P.