U.S. Markets open in 4 hrs 42 mins

Is Superconductor Technologies Inc (NASDAQ:SCON) Undervalued?

Mary Ramos

Superconductor Technologies Inc ( NASDAQ:SCON ), a electronic company based in United States, received a lot of attention from a substantial price movement on the NasdaqCM over the last few months, increasing to $1.2 at one point, and dropping to the lows of $0.86. This high level of volatility gives investors the opportunity to enter into the stock, and potentially buy at an artificially low price. A question to answer is whether Superconductor Technologies’s current trading price of $0.9 reflective of the actual value of the small-cap? Or is it currently undervalued, providing us with the opportunity to buy? Let’s take a look at Superconductor Technologies’s outlook and value based on the most recent financial data to see if there are any catalysts for a price change. Check out our latest analysis for Superconductor Technologies

What is Superconductor Technologies worth?

According to my relative valuation model, the stock seems to be currently fairly priced. I’ve used the price-to-book ratio in this instance because there’s not enough visibility to forecast its cash flows, and its earnings doesn’t seem to reflect its true value. The stock’s ratio of 2.29x is currently trading slightly above its industry peers’ ratio of 2.02x, which means if you buy Superconductor Technologies today, you’d be paying a relatively fair price for it. And if you believe Superconductor Technologies should be trading in this range, then there isn’t really any room for the share price grow beyond what it’s currently trading. Furthermore, it seems like Superconductor Technologies’s share price is quite stable, which means there may be less chances to buy low in the future now that it’s fairly valued. This is because the stock is less volatile than the wider market given its low beta.

What does the future of Superconductor Technologies look like?

NasdaqCM:SCON Future Profit May 24th 18

Future outlook is an important aspect when you’re looking at buying a stock, especially if you are an investor looking for growth in your portfolio. Buying a great company with a robust outlook at a cheap price is always a good investment, so let’s also take a look at the company’s future expectations. With profit expected to grow by 99.16% over the next couple of years, the future seems bright for Superconductor Technologies. It looks like higher cash flows is on the cards for the stock, which should feed into a higher share valuation.

What this means for you:

Are you a shareholder? It seems like the market has already priced in SCON’s positive outlook, with shares trading around its fair value. However, there are also other important factors which we haven’t considered today, such as the financial strength of the company. Have these factors changed since the last time you looked at SCON? Will you have enough confidence to invest in the company should the price drop below its fair value?

Are you a potential investor? If you’ve been keeping tabs on SCON, now may not be the most optimal time to buy, given it is trading around its fair value. However, the optimistic prospect is encouraging for SCON, which means it’s worth further examining other factors such as the strength of its balance sheet, in order to take advantage of the next price drop.

Price is just the tip of the iceberg. Dig deeper into what truly matters – the fundamentals – before you make a decision on Superconductor Technologies. You can find everything you need to know about Superconductor Technologies in the latest infographic research report . If you are no longer interested in Superconductor Technologies, you can use our free platform to see my list of over 50 other stocks with a high growth potential .


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.